认知语用学焦点问题研究

pragmaticsisinaconstantstateoffluxandevolution，therehaveappeareddifferentperspectivesorapproachestopragmatics，suchasdascal（1983）analyzesthefieldfromthestandpointofthephilosophyoflanguage，green（1989/1996）laysparticularemphasisontextualpragmaticsandmoreformalaspectsofpragmatics，mey（1993）regardspragmaticsthesocietallynecessaryandconsciouslyinteractivedimensionofthestudyoflanguage，thomas（1995）arguesconvincinglyforasocial，psychologicalandcognitiveapproachtopragmatics，verschueren（1999）layshisemphasisonageneralcognitive，socialandculturalperspectiveonlanguageuse，whileblakemore（1992）andsperber&wilson（1986/1995）takeacognitiveapproach.onthebasisoftheabove，pragmaticsbecomesmorelikelytobeconsideredcognitivelyinvolved，althoughtherestillexistsdisagreementsonwhatcognitivepragmaticsisandwhatcoreissuesshouldbeaddressed，andthelike.anyhowitisheldinthestudythatcognitivepragmaticsfocusesonthementalprocessingofinformationforcommunicativepurposesandontheinterlocutors''''abilitiesintermsofwhichtheycreateandunderstandmeaningsbeyondthewordandsentencelevels.